Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 32
Filter
2.
Sports Health ; : 19417381241231590, 2024 Feb 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38410862

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity bone stress injuries (BSIs) are common among athletes who participate in high-impact activities. Conventional imaging is limited in assessing healing of BSIs. HYPOTHESIS: Serial ultrasonography (US) can identify changes in appearance of lower extremity BSIs over time that can be correlated with symptoms and return to exercise/sport. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort observational study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3. METHODS: Adults 18 to 50 years old with a recent exercise-associated BSI of distal tibia/fibula or metatarsals diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were enrolled. US was performed every 2 weeks for 12 weeks. The sonographic appearance (soft tissue edema, periosteal reaction, hyperemia on power Doppler, callus) was correlated with the numerical rating scale (NRS) for pain and ability to return to sport/exercise. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled (mean age, 35.3 ± 7.7 years; 21 [70.0%] female). The tibia was most frequently affected (n = 15, 50.0%), followed by metatarsals (n = 14, 46.7%) and fibula (n = 1, 3.3%). At week 4, 25 of 30 (83.3%) had at least 1 US finding associated with the BSI. The degree of hyperemia was correlated with NRS at weeks 4 and 6 (Spearman correlations [ρ] 0.45 [0.09, 0.69] and 0.42 [0.07, 0.67], respectively), as well as return to sport/exercise at week 6 (ρ -0.45 [-0.68, -0.09]). US soft tissue edema was also correlated with NRS at week 6 (ρ 0.38 [0.02, 0.65]). CONCLUSION: Serial US of lower extremity BSIs can provide objective measures of healing. US findings were correlated with clinical outcomes at multiple timepoints. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: US may have advantages over conventional imaging for monitoring healing of lower extremity BSIs. Further research is needed to better understand the prognostic value of these sonographic indicators of BSI healing and role in assessing readiness for return to sport/exercise.

3.
Br J Sports Med ; 2023 Oct 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37875331

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to describe the incidence of injuries and illnesses sustained during the Beijing Winter Olympic Games from 4 February 2022 to 20 February 2022. METHODS: We recorded the daily number of athlete injuries and illnesses (1) through the reporting of all National Olympic Committee (NOC) medical teams and (2) in the polyclinic and medical venues by the Beijing 2022 medical staff. RESULTS: In total, 2848 athletes (1276 women, 45%; 1572 men, 55%) from 91 NOCs were followed prospectively for the occurrence of injury and illness. NOC and Beijing 2022 medical staff reported 289 injuries and 109 illnesses, equalling 10.1 injuries and 3.8 illnesses per 100 athletes over the 17-day period. The injury incidence was highest in ski halfpipe (30%), ski big air (28%), snowboard slopestyle (23%) and ski slopestyle (22%), and lowest (1%-2%) in curling, alpine mixed team parallel slalom, Nordic combined and alpine super-G. The illness incidence was highest in ski aerials (10%), skeleton (8%), cross-country skiing (8%) and Nordic combined (7%). In the study period, COVID-19 affected 32 athletes, accounting for 29% of all illnesses affecting 1.1% of all athletes. CONCLUSION: Overall, 10% of the athletes incurred an injury and 4% an illness during the Beijing Winter Olympic Games. The incidence of illnesses overall, which was the lowest yet recorded in the Winter Olympic Games, and COVID-19 was mitigated through comprehensive countermeasures.

4.
Br J Sports Med ; 57(3): 146-152, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36113976

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Training patterns are commonly implicated in running injuries. The purpose of this study was to measure the incidence of injury and illness among marathon runners and the association of injuries with training patterns and workload. METHODS: Runners registered for the New York City Marathon were eligible to enrol and prospectively monitored during the 16 weeks before the marathon, divided into 4-week 'training quarters' (TQ) numbered TQ1-TQ4. Training runs were tracked using Strava, a web and mobile platform for tracking exercise. Runners were surveyed at the end of each TQ on injury and illness, and to verify all training runs were recorded. Acute:chronic workload ratio (ACWR) was calculated by dividing the running distance in the past 7 days by the running distance in the past 28 days and analysed using ratio thresholds of 1.3 and 1.5. RESULTS: A total of 735 runners participated, mean age 41.0 (SD 10.7) and 46.0% female. Runners tracked 49 195 training runs. The incidence of injury during training was 40.0% (294/735), and the incidence of injury during or immediately after the marathon was 16.0% (112/699). The incidence of illness during training was 27.2% (200/735). Those reporting an initial injury during TQ3 averaged less distance/week during TQ2 compared with uninjured runners, 27.7 vs 31.9 miles/week (p=0.018). Runners reporting an initial injury during TQ1 had more days when the ACWR during TQ1 was ≥1.5 compared with uninjured runners (injured IQR (0-3) days vs uninjured (0-1) days, p=0.009). Multivariable logistic regression for training injuries found an association with the number of days when the ACWR was ≥1.5 (OR 1.06, 95% CI (1.02 to 1.10), p=0.002). CONCLUSION: Increases in training volume ≥1.5 ACWR were associated with more injuries among runners training for a marathon. These findings can inform training recommendations and injury prevention programmes for distance runners.


Subject(s)
Exercise , Marathon Running , Humans , Female , Adult , Male , New York City/epidemiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Logistic Models
5.
Sports Health ; 14(5): 614-615, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36048107

Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sports , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
6.
Curr Hypertens Rep ; 24(10): 477-484, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35788968

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the prevalence, short- and long-term impact of exercise on blood pressure, and the evaluation and treatment of hypertension in competitive athletes. RECENT FINDINGS: Due, in part, to inconsistencies in measurement and the definitions used, the true prevalence of hypertension is unknown as reports range from 0 to 83%. With recent changes in the blood pressure guidelines, the proportion of athletes that meet criteria for elevated blood pressure or stage 1 hypertension has increased dramatically with over one-third of collegiate and professional athletes meeting criteria for hypertension. Data consistently show that American-style football players, particularly linemen, display the highest rates of hypertension. These athletes typically have a larger body mass index, higher body fat percentage, and weight gain in serial follow-up. Many athletes with hypertension have traditional risk factors, and, to date, there is no evidence of a causal relationship between long-term sport participation and increased risk of developing hypertension. Many more athletes now meet criteria for hypertension, given the updated blood pressure guidelines. This should be taken as an opportunity for early intervention, as athletes are not immune to the development of cardiovascular risk factors and disease.


Subject(s)
Football , Hypertension , Antihypertensive Agents , Athletes , Blood Pressure/physiology , Football/physiology , Humans , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/epidemiology
7.
Sports Health ; 14(5): 616-617, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35632992

Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Sports , Athletes , Humans
8.
Sports Health ; 14(3): 372-376, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34906009

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) affects multiple organ systems. Whether and how COVID-19 affects the musculoskeletal system remains unknown. We aim to assess the association between COVID-19 and risk of injury. HYPOTHESIS: Runners who report having COVID-19 also report a higher incidence of injury. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4. METHODS: An electronic survey was distributed from July through September 2020, by New York Road Runners, ASICS North America, race medical directors, and through social media. Inclusion criteria were runners 18 years or older who had participated in ≥1 race (running or triathlon) in 2019. RESULTS: A total of 1947 runners participated and met inclusion criteria. Average age was 45.0 (SD, 12.2) years and 56.5% were women. A total of 123 (6.3%) runners self-reported having COVID-19; 100 (81%) reported their diagnosis was from a laboratory test (polymerase chain reaction or antibody) and 23 reported being diagnosed by a medical professional without confirmatory laboratory testing. Since March 2020, 427 (21.9%) reported an injury that prevented running for at least 1 week, including 38 of 123 (30.9%) who self-reported having COVID-19 and 389 of 1435 (21.3%) who did not report having COVID-19 (P = 0.01). After adjusting for age, sex, the number of races in 2019, and running patterns before March 2020, runners who self-reported a diagnosis of COVID-19 had a higher incidence of injury compared with those who did not (odds ratio, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.11-2.48; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Injuries were more often self-reported by runners with laboratory-confirmed or clinically diagnosed COVID-19 compared with those who did not report COVID-19. Given the limitations of the study, any direct role of COVID-19 in the pathophysiology of injuries among runners remains unclear. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Direct and indirect musculoskeletal sequelae of COVID-19 should be further investigated, including the risk of exercise- and sports-related injury after COVID-19.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , COVID-19 , Musculoskeletal System , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal System/injuries
10.
HSS J ; 17(1): 18-24, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33967637

ABSTRACT

Background: The use of telehealth has increased as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. As sports at all levels resume, sports medicine physicians may be interested in how telehealth can be used for concussion care. Questions/Purpose: We sought to assess how telehealth has been used in the baseline testing, diagnosis, and/or management of concussion. Secondarily, we sought to assess the strengths and weaknesses of telehealth for concussion care and identify aspects of concussion care for which telehealth has not yet been studied. Methods: A systematic review was performed in September 2020 of PubMed and Embase using the following terms: concuss*, "mild traumatic brain," "head injur*," telehealth, telemedicine, telecare, "mobile health," m-health, virtual. Studies included were original research articles investigating the use of telehealth in the care of concussion (including baseline testing, diagnosis, and management), published in English, and had full text available. Results: A total of 356 articles were screened, of which 5 were determined to meet inclusion criteria. These articles described the use of telehealth for managing concussion in military and rural settings. No articles involved the use of telehealth for baseline concussion testing of athletes or for sideline evaluation. Conclusion: Despite the limited original research on the use of telehealth for concussion care, the articles identified provide a foundation for exploring the potential value of telehealth in the office practice and sports team setting. Telehealth may expand the ability of a sports medicine physician to provide timely and effective concussion care to athletes during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. More rigorous research is needed.

11.
J Hand Ther ; 34(2): 159-165, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34011470

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is a high incidence of performance-related musculoskeletal disorders in musicians that may be reduced via education programs. However, the efficacy of formalized injury prevention programs has not been rigorously studied. PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and effect of a formalized injury prevention education workshop on incidence and severity of musculoskeletal pain in a cohort of musician-students attending an intensive summer music festival compared to controls. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized-controlled-pilot trial. METHODS: Musicians at an 8-week long intensive summer festival were randomized to an intervention (workshop) or control group. Workshop attendees participated in a 90-minute session of injury prevention strategies. Musculoskeletal outcome data were collected at the start and end of the festival. Outcomes included presence of musculoskeletal pain, adherence level, and sub-scales of the Musculoskeletal Pain Intensity and Interference Questionnaire for Musicians. RESULTS: A total of 57 musician-students (ages 17-30, 23 females) participated in the study, and 48(84%) completed the study. Seventy-five percent of workshop participants reported adherence over 8 weeks. At baseline, 84% of participants reported a history of playing-related pain, and 47% recent or current pain. Participants played a range of instruments (50% string, 34% piano, 16% woodwind/brass). At baseline, average weekly reported playing time was 39 hours (±11). At follow-up, reported pain decreased by 32% in the intervention group and increased by 8% in controls (P < .01). Pain interference scores were lower (Post - Pre = -4.58, 95% CI -9.26 to 0.11, P = .055). There was no statistically significant difference between groups for pain intensity. CONCLUSIONS: The high compliance and willingness to participate suggests that injury prevention education implementation is feasible. Our preliminary findings suggest a positive effect on pain incidence and pain interference in the intervention group. Future studies will examine the relationship between adherence levels and injury rates in a larger cohort and identify obstacles to implementation.


Subject(s)
Musculoskeletal Diseases , Musculoskeletal Pain , Music , Occupational Diseases , Adolescent , Adult , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Musculoskeletal Diseases/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Diseases/prevention & control , Musculoskeletal Pain/epidemiology , Musculoskeletal Pain/prevention & control , Pilot Projects , Students , Young Adult
12.
Clin J Sport Med ; 31(3): e137-e143, 2021 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31219928

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To generate a summative report on the most commonly diagnosed illnesses in Major League Baseball (MLB) and Minor League Baseball (MiLB) athletes with specific attention to their impact based on time out of play. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: Injury and illness data from the MLB Health and Injury Tracking System. PARTICIPANTS: All MLB and MiLB athletes active between 2011 and 2016. ASSESSMENT OF RISK FACTORS: Illnesses were defined as atraumatic medical diagnoses that occurred during the MLB or MiLB season and resulted in at least 1 day out of play. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of illness diagnoses and resulting time out play. RESULTS: Eight thousand eight hundred thirty-four illnesses were reported, representing 14.7% of all diagnoses resulting in time out of play. Total days missed (DM) due to illness were 39 614, with a mean of 4.6 (SD 9.9 days) and median 2 DM per diagnosis. The annual incidence of illness per season was 20.3 per 100 athletes. The most common diagnosis was nonspecific viral illness (15.3%), followed by gastroenteritis (13.6%), other gastrointestinal illness (8.3%), influenza (7.0%), and upper respiratory infection (6.2%). Appendicitis (15.2%) and Epstein-Barr virus/cytomegalovirus (9.1%) were the most common season-ending diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Illnesses represent a significant cause of time out of play in MLB and MiLB. Prevention efforts should focus on limiting the spread of communicable viral, respiratory, and gastrointestinal disease among players, as the majority of diagnoses fell into these categories. This work may be used to guide future research into illness treatment and prevention in professional baseball.


Subject(s)
Baseball , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections , Epstein-Barr Virus Infections/epidemiology , Herpesvirus 4, Human , Humans , Retrospective Studies
13.
Br J Sports Med ; 55(6): 305-318, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33122252

ABSTRACT

Despite the worldwide popularity of running as a sport for children, relatively little is known about its impact on injury and illness. Available studies have focused on adolescent athletes, but these findings may not be applicable to preadolescent and pubescent athletes. To date, there are no evidence or consensus-based guidelines identifying risk factors for injury and illness in youth runners, and current recommendations regarding suitable running distances for youth runners at different ages are opinion based. The International Committee Consensus Work Group convened to evaluate the current science, identify knowledge gaps, categorise risk factors for injury/illness and provide recommendations regarding training, nutrition and participation for youth runners.


Subject(s)
Running/injuries , Running/physiology , Adolescent , Age Factors , Body Mass Index , Body Size , Bone and Bones/physiology , Child , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/etiology , Foot/physiology , Humans , Muscle Strength , Nutritional Requirements , Physical Conditioning, Human/adverse effects , Physical Conditioning, Human/methods , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Shoes , Stress, Mechanical
14.
HSS J ; 16(Suppl 2): 408-411, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33380974

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bone stress injuries (BSIs) are common among runners for which activity modification is the primary treatment. The clinical utility of measuring activity during recovery has not been evaluated. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We sought to measure the physical activity of runners recovering from BSIs and determine if activity can be correlated with symptoms. METHODS: A prospective observational pilot study was performed of runners with a new lower extremity BSI treated non-surgically. For 30 days, activity of runners was measured with a physical activity tracker and daily pain scores were collected. RESULTS: We enrolled 18 runners (average age, 33 years; 72% female). Twelve had stress fractures and six had stress reactions. The average daily steps of all runners during the observation period was 10,018 ± 3232, and the runner with the highest daily steps averaged 15,976. There were similar average daily steps in those with stress fractures versus reactions, 10,329 versus 9965, respectively. There was no correlation between daily steps or relative change in daily steps with pain or relative change in pain scores. CONCLUSION: Runners with BSIs averaged over 10,000 steps per day during early recovery. Clinicians may not be aware of the amount of activity runners maintain after being diagnosed with a BSI. Although daily steps and symptoms could not be correlated in this study, objectively measuring activity may assist clinicians in guiding runners recovering from BSIs.

15.
HSS J ; 16(Suppl 1): 102-107, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32837412

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant morbidity and mortality around the world. The spectrum of COVID-19 is broad, from clinical disease requiring intensive medical care to less severe symptoms that are treated with supportive care. The majority of COVID-19 cases fall into the mild-to-moderate category, with symptoms lasting less than 6 weeks. Nevertheless, the morbidity from COVID-19 is significant and can affect multiple body systems, most frequently the cardiac, pulmonary, hematologic, musculoskeletal, and gastrointestinal systems. For patients who wish to return to exercise after mild-to-moderate COVID-19, the wide range of disease expression presents a challenge for clinicians seeking to offer counsel. This literature review on return to activity following mild to moderate COVID-19 in the recreational athlete includes evidence-based considerations and recommendations for clinicians in guiding the safest return to activity.

16.
J Bone Joint Surg Am ; 102(14): 1197-1204, 2020 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32675661

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an emerging pandemic disease caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Although the majority of patients who become infected with SARS-CoV-2 are asymptomatic or have mild symptoms, some patients develop severe symptoms that can permanently detract from their quality of life. SARS-CoV-2 is closely related to SARS-CoV-1, which causes severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Both viruses infect the respiratory system, and there are direct and indirect effects of this infection on multiple organ systems, including the musculoskeletal system. Epidemiological data from the SARS pandemic of 2002 to 2004 identified myalgias, muscle dysfunction, osteoporosis, and osteonecrosis as common sequelae in patients with moderate and severe forms of this disease. Early studies have indicated that there is also considerable musculoskeletal dysfunction in some patients with COVID-19, although long-term follow-up studies have not yet been conducted. The purpose of this article was to summarize the known musculoskeletal pathologies in patients with SARS or COVID-19 and to combine this with computational modeling and biochemical signaling studies to predict musculoskeletal cellular targets and long-term consequences of the SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/complications , Musculoskeletal System/physiopathology , Pneumonia, Viral/complications , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 , Betacoronavirus , Bone and Bones/physiopathology , COVID-19 , Computer Simulation , Humans , Joints/physiopathology , Muscle Weakness/virology , Muscle, Skeletal/physiopathology , Myalgia/virology , Pandemics , Peptidyl-Dipeptidase A/genetics , SARS-CoV-2 , Serine Endopeptidases/genetics
18.
Clin J Sport Med ; 30(4): 315-320, 2020 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29952837

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the available infrastructure for secondary testing after preparticipation cardiovascular screening of collegiate athletes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) athletic programs PARTICIPANTS:: Team physicians. INTERVENTIONS: Online survey distributed by the NCAA and American Medical Society for Sports Medicine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Availability of secondary cardiovascular diagnostic testing and services. RESULTS: Team physicians from 235 schools completed the assessment, representing 21% of all NCAA schools. Ninety (38.3%) NCAA team physicians reported screening athletes using electrocardiogram (ECG). Division I schools were more likely than Division II and III schools to perform both screening ECG (RR, 2.38, P < 0.0001) and echocardiogram (RR, 2.83, P = 0.01). More than 97% of schools had access to resting echocardiogram, stress ECG/echocardiogram, and Holter monitoring within 25 miles with no significant variability between divisions, regions, or size of undergraduate student body. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and electrophysiology studies were available within 25 miles of more than 80% of schools, and genetics testing was available within 25 miles for 64.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary testing for cardiovascular abnormalities seems to be readily available for NCAA athletes, regardless of division, region, or school size.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Mass Screening , Sports Medicine/organization & administration , Sports , Universities/organization & administration , Cross-Sectional Studies , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Echocardiography , Electrocardiography , Electrocardiography, Ambulatory , Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac , Health Surveys , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Mass Screening/methods , Medical History Taking , Physical Examination , United States
19.
Sports Health ; 12(1): 74-79, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31642726

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lower extremity overuse injuries are common among runners, especially first-time marathoners. Hip abductor and quadriceps strengthening is often recommended to reduce running-related injuries. HYPOTHESIS: A 12-week strength training program would decrease the rate of overuse injuries resulting in marathon noncompletion and improve race finishing time. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized trial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. METHODS: Twelve weeks before the New York City Marathon, first-time marathon runners age 18 years and older were randomized into a strength training group or an observation group. The strength training group was instructed to perform a 10-minute program 3 times weekly using written and video instruction. This program targeted the quadriceps, hip abductor, and core muscle groups. Injuries were self-reported through biweekly surveys, with major injuries being those that resulted in marathon noncompletion and minor injuries being those that impaired training or race performance. RESULTS: A total of 720 runners were enrolled (mean age, 35.9 ± 9.4 years; 69.4% female), of whom 583 runners started the marathon and 579 completed it. The incidence of major injury was 8.9% and minor injury was 48.5%. Fifty two of 64 major injuries were overuse, of which 20 were bone stress injuries. The incidence of overuse injury resulting in marathon noncompletion was 7.1% in the strength training group and 7.3% in the observation group (risk ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.57-1.63; P = 0.90). The mean finishing time was 5 hours 1 ± 60 minutes in the strength training group and 4 hours 58 ± 55 minutes in the observation group (P = 0.35). CONCLUSION: There is a high prevalence of injury among first-time marathon runners, but this self-directed strength training program did not decrease overuse injury incidence resulting in marathon noncompletion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Prevention strategies such as strength training need to be developed and evaluated through clinical trials to reduce the high prevalence of overuse injuries in runners, especially for high-risk populations such as first-time marathon runners.


Subject(s)
Cumulative Trauma Disorders/prevention & control , Lower Extremity/injuries , Muscle Strength/physiology , Physical Endurance/physiology , Resistance Training , Running/injuries , Adult , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/epidemiology , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/physiopathology , Humans , New York City/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Running/physiology
20.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 8(14): e012235, 2019 07 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31286819

ABSTRACT

Background Preparticipation cardiovascular screening in athletes is fully endorsed by major medical societies, yet the most effective screening protocol remains debated. We prospectively compared the performance of the American Heart Association ( AHA ) 14-point screening evaluation and a resting ECG for cardiovascular screening of high school athletes. Methods and Results Competitive athletes participating in organized high school or premier/select level sports underwent cardiovascular screening using the AHA 14-point history and physical examination, and an ECG interpreted with the Seattle Criteria. A limited echocardiogram was performed for all screening abnormalities. The primary outcome measure was identification of a cardiovascular disorder associated with sudden cardiac death. From October 2014 to June 2017, 3620 high school athletes (median age, 16 years; range 13-19; 46.2% female; 78.6% white, 8.0% black) were screened. One or more positive responses to the AHA 14-point questionnaire were present in 814 (22.5%) athletes. The most common history responses included chest pain (8.1%), family history of inheritable conditions (7.3%), and shortness of breath (6.4%). Abnormal physical examination was present in 356 (9.8%) athletes, and 103 (2.8%) athletes had an abnormal ECG . Sixteen (0.4%) athletes had conditions associated with sudden cardiac death. The sensitivity (18.8%), specificity (68.0%), and positive predictive value (0.3%) of the AHA 14-point evaluation was substantially lower than the sensitivity (87.5%), specificity (97.5%), and positive predictive value (13.6%) of ECG . Conclusions The AHA 14-point evaluation performs poorly compared with ECG for cardiovascular screening of high school athletes. The use of consensus-derived history questionnaires as the primary tool for cardiovascular screening in athletes should be reevaluated.


Subject(s)
Athletes , Cardiovascular Diseases/diagnosis , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/prevention & control , Electrocardiography , Students , Adolescent , American Heart Association , Aortic Diseases/complications , Aortic Diseases/diagnosis , Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic/complications , Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases/complications , Cardiovascular Diseases/physiopathology , Chest Pain/physiopathology , Coronary Vessel Anomalies/complications , Coronary Vessel Anomalies/diagnosis , Death, Sudden, Cardiac/etiology , Dyspnea/physiopathology , Echocardiography , Female , Humans , Long QT Syndrome/complications , Long QT Syndrome/diagnosis , Male , Mass Screening/methods , Medical History Taking , Physical Examination , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity , Surveys and Questionnaires , Syncope/physiopathology , United States , Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome/complications , Wolff-Parkinson-White Syndrome/diagnosis , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...